The Curse of a Phobia
Question 16 found at the bottom of this page
High places should be easy to avoid. There is no compelling reason to climb a tree, for example, or to ride a roller coaster. But somehow, when Beth Cox was driving her daughter from their Atlanta home to Oklahoma two years ago, she found herself crossing the Mississippi River, over the truly terrifying Hernando de Soto Bridge in Memphis. "I started hyperventilating. I started going hysterical. I thought we were going to die," she recalls, describing the experience with rueful humor and lingering embarrassment.
Not that her reaction came as a complete surprise. Indeed, it was unhappily familiar. Cox is, by her own description, "fearless" in all other parts of her life. A beloved reading and math teacher in a suburban Atlanta elementary school, she projects the calm competence of the woman you would immediately turn to in a crisis. So her fear of heights seems incongruous. But for most of her 51 years, especially after she had children, acrophobia (as it''s technically known) has been the uninvited guest at too many events in her life. On a family vacation on Pikes Peak four years ago, her husband and two teenage daughters stood outside, exhilarated by the panoramic view, while Cox huddled in the back seat of their rental car, hyperventilating, crying, and trembling.
Cox is one of approximately 14.8 million American adults who suffer from irrational fears of a particular situation, object, or experience. Today, anxiety disorders are the most common mental illness in the United States, afflicting 13.3 percent of adults. And the nature of these disorders seems to reflect the landscape of worry and stress of 21st-century life: Overdue bills and Code Orange terrorism alerts merely top the list of worries stressing people out. But for some people, they trigger or fuel a host of anxiety disorders. Obsessive-compulsive disorder, for example, in which men and women become enslaved to elaborate and sometimes painful rituals: Hands are washed until they are raw and bleeding; pockets are jammed with tiny talismans that seem to be essential for life itself; food cannot be eaten unless a specific place setting is arranged in a precise way. After 9/11, post-traumatic stress disorder seemed to become as common as the cold in day care, with flashbacks, bad dreams, and sleepless nights afflicting thousands and thousands of people. Then there are phobias, like social phobia, where a conversation with a neighbor can cause a paralyzing sense of dread, or specific phobias like Beth Cox''s acrophobia. Agoraphobia translates literally as fear of the marketplace (which today might be called fear of the mall). Some who suffer from agoraphobia panic when they''re in public places; others simply become paralyzed, unable to leave their homes.
Where fear lives. The new treatments are important because the cost of fear to society, in terms of medical costs and lost productivity, is staggering. A 1999 study documented that the annual cost of anxiety disorders in the United States (in 1990, the most recent numbers available) was about $42.3 billion, or $1,542 per American. An estimated $22.8 billion of that went for nonpsychiatric medical treatment.
Because anxiety disorders so frequently involve physical symptoms, victims often believe that this time they really are having a heart attack, a brain tumor, or a stroke. "People with panic disorder come in and say, Doc, I feel this or that," says psychiatrist Barbara Milrod of Weill Medical College. So the doctor gives them a complete physical and perhaps even says that anxiety is the cause. But they don''t believe it, Milrod explains, "so they decide they need an MRI just to make sure they don''t have a brain tumor. People go through this over and over again." And the healthcare costs keep rising. People with an anxiety disorder are three to five times as likely to go to the doctor and six times as likely to be hospitalized for psychiatric disorders as those who don''t have them.
As agonizing as irrational fear can be for the afflicted, it has been a gold mine for researchers. Most diseases, from cancer to depression, involve a complex interaction of genes and physiology, but doctors typically know something about their physical location in the patient''s body. Not so for illnesses of the mind like depression or bipolar disorder. But fear is different. Nobel Prize winner and Columbia University professor Eric Kandel describes it as "the one, the only area in psychiatry in which we have an anatomical substrate." We know, in other words, where fear lives.
And we know this largely because of the lowly rat. For years, researchers have explored the brains of rats, and they finally identified the place where fear lodges in the neurons. According to New York University psychologist Joseph LeDoux, "The hub in the wheel of fear" is the small, almond-shaped brain structure called the amygdala. While it is extremely important in terms of regulating all sorts of emotions, the amygdala has long been recognized as being the air traffic controller of the fear response in mammals.
Chicken Little. Animals can be conditioned to be fearful. In simple experiments that couple a tone with a mild shock, the amygdala is activated by the tone, sending alert signals to all parts of the body. This conditioned response tells the heart to beat faster, blood pressure to elevate, sweat glands to start sweating, and, often, the stomach to start churning. Even without the actual shock, the body acts as if it has been shocked because the amygdala sends out the alert signals at the sound of the tone. The amygdala, it seems, can play two very different roles: one as the responsible adult organizing the body to respond well to a disaster, the other as Chicken Little.
While the amygdala organizes the fear response, its neighboring brain structure, the sea-horse-shaped hippocampus, plays its part in storing memories of the shock and reminding the rat that it was shocked when a particular tone was played. A feedback loop is created so that even the memory of the shock will stress the rat and activate the amygdala. Stress, says LeDoux, can spark all kinds of fears and phobias.
These are the primitive, unconscious fear responses deeply wired into our brains, and only after they occur does the cortex get involved--the conscious part of our brains that can rationalize, explain, and inform. The prefrontal cortex could have told Cox that the likelihood of driving off the Hernando de Soto Bridge was slim, but it was too late. By the time the cortex comprehended what was happening, the hippocampus and the amygdala had taken charge, illustrating that gut-level fear is far more potent than our intellectual analysis.
A rose is a rose. Why do our amygdalas react to one stimulus and not another? Why is the fear of heights or snakes or spiders so common while the fear of, say, rain isn''t? Some clue can be found in evolution. In one experiment, laboratory baby monkeys were shown a tape of adult female monkeys acting fearfully with a snake. When snakes were brought into the lab, even plastic ones, the monkeys panicked. Then the same baby monkeys were shown doctored tapes, in which roses were spliced in where the snakes used to be, and the mother monkeys looked as if they were acting fearfully with a rose. When presented with roses, however, the babies could not have cared less. Findings like this lead many researchers to conclude that "one reason there is a limited number of phobias is because we have preserved a genetically hard-wired disposition to be frightened of certain things and not the others," says Ned Kalin, chair of psychiatry at the University of Wisconsin Medical School.
Unlearning. Exposure therapy and cognitive behavioral therapy have been used successfully in reducing and even eliminating fears and phobias. Since the dread of feeling fear reinforces the phobia--if the bridge or the tunnel or the snake is avoided, so are the feelings of panic--the challenge of therapy is to make that feeling less frightening. Over and over again, patients are put in situations that catalyze the pounding heart and dripping sweat, and they are taught that those feelings need not exert such a powerful influence in their lives. They are learning new ways of coping. But what if there were a way to learn more quickly? During his work with rats, Michael Davis at Emory University found that some proteins in the amygdala called NMDA receptors may actually speed up the process of unlearning fear and offer an entirely new option for treatment. "Many years ago, we discovered that the NMDA receptor protein in the amygdala was not only necessary to learn to be afraid," Davis says. "It was also necessary to learn not to be afraid." If those proteins were blocked in rats, then the extinction process was far more difficult. If these proteins were bolstered somehow--and they could be with a drug called D-Cycloserine (DCS) that had been used for treating tuberculosis but now had a new application--then they facilitated the extinction of fear.
When Beth Cox returned to Atlanta from Oklahoma, using a different bridge in Memphis to avoid the scene of her most frightening panic episode, she realized it was time to finally try to tackle her fears. Back home, she saw an advertisement asking for volunteers who were afraid of heights to be a part of a treatment study. Cox called and soon found herself in Decatur, Ga., in a warren of offices called Virtually Better. Virtually Better is both a virtual-reality laboratory and a treatment center in which clients are able to fly in an airplane, talk to an audience, stand on a wooden bridge hundreds of feet above a ravine--and never leave the office. A helmet with a screen inches away from the eye presents clients with a range of computer-generated experiences. No longer does a therapist need to take a client over a bridge or on an elevator. By confronting their fears and phobias this way, many Virtually Better clients, like Cox, can overcome them.
While virtual-reality therapy is becoming mainstream for the treatment of specific phobias, the study that Cox participated in involved the use of DCS. She was one of 27 people with acrophobia who were given two sessions of virtual-reality treatment for height phobia. Afterward, the group was divided into three subgroups: One received a sugar pill, one received a low dose of DCS, and the third received a higher dose of DCS. Fear was measured both through the descriptions of those who participated and through objective measures of the skin to register how agitated the person was. Cox received the higher dose of DCS. The results of the treatment were published last month in the Archives of General Psychiatry. Those who received any dose of DCS managed to conquer their fears more effectively than those who got the placebo, and the effects lasted. Three months later, the DCS recipients still felt better. Not only did the drug have no side effects, but it was used only during the learning process. "We have not found that it facilitates fear conditioning itself," Davis says. "For whatever reason, it is just unique to extinction."
Beautiful. For Beth Cox, life has been transformed. A few months after her therapy, she went with her family to a wedding in Miami. They were treated to the best room in the hotel, a corner room on the 26th floor with floor-to-ceiling glass windows and a panoramic view. "Before, I never understood why they built hotels like this," she says. "But now I do, because it''s beautiful. It''s not like I spend my Saturdays looking for something high. But now when I am there, I know that I can handle it."
The knowledge that fear can be handled contains all the elements for conquering it. Even with all the new understanding of the biology of fear and of new treatments, Columbia''s Kandel points out that there is still much to learn: "The human mind is the most complex problem in all of science," he says. "These are complex emotional problems that have intrigued philosophers from time immemorial. Plato and Aristotle struggled with these issues. It''s not surprising that they haven''t been solved." Clearly, they haven''t. But for those who suffer from fear and phobias, the lack of a neat solution no longer means a lack of hope.
Personal Reflection Exercise #2
Forward to Section 17
Back to Section 15
Table of Contents